Radon test result

Tom (archive)

Usenet Archive
Joined
Jul 1, 2000
Messages
1,217
Reaction score
0
My test result have come and the levels are 320 Boquerels?? which is above the action level of 200. A few pamphlets came with the test results suggesting various remedies. Has anyone had similar problems and would like to share their experience so I can take a more educated judgment/action. Thanks Tom
 

newshound

Usenet Archive
Joined
Dec 31, 2004
Messages
2,095
Reaction score
0
Bequerels; I suspect this will be 320 Bequerels per cubic metre, meaning that each cubic metre of air contains 320 radon atoms decaying per second. (In general 1 Bequerel just means a quantity of any radioactive material in which one atom decays per second).

Others will advise you on action, but I'd comment that it's not very much above the action limit. There's a tendency for people to regard government "limits" for all sorts of pollutents as "danger limits", e.g. 199 is "safe" and 201 is an immediate threat to life and limb. In fact the limits are usually levels where the risk is very small compared to other natural risks.
 

Grunff

Usenet Archive
Joined
Jul 3, 2003
Messages
3,140
Reaction score
0
Tom said:
My test result have come and the levels are 320 Boquerels?? which is above the action level of 200. A few pamphlets came with the test results suggesting various remedies. Has anyone had similar problems and would like to share their experience so I can take a more educated judgment/action.
Very easy to bring the level down (if you feel this is necessary; but that's a different story) by increasing the ventilation. What are the current ventilaltion arrangements for each room?
 

The Natural Philosopher

Usenet Archive
Joined
Jul 5, 2003
Messages
29,127
Reaction score
0
Grunff said:
Very easy to bring the level down (if you feel this is necessary; but that's a different story) by increasing the ventilation. What are the current ventilaltion arrangements for each room?
Normal BCO resolution in cases like this is to insist on suspended floors with underfloor vents I believe.

Its a bit of a pain to mod an existing house.
 

Dave Liquorice

Usenet Archive
Joined
Jul 6, 2003
Messages
11,640
Reaction score
0
Normal BCO resolution in cases like this is to insist on suspended floors with underfloor vents I believe.
I guess most comes up from the ground, but what about walls made of that nice cornish granite? Ventilation is the way to deal with it though.

Maybe we need more info from the OP. Type/age of house, floor construction, recently fitted DG'ing etc. I'd have thought any moderately recent place with a solid floor would have a plastic DPM these days. Can Radon get through plastic DPM?
 

Grunff

Usenet Archive
Joined
Jul 3, 2003
Messages
3,140
Reaction score
0
Dave said:
I guess most comes up from the ground, but what about walls made of that nice cornish granite?
The reason suspended floors with a 'sump' arrangement work is because radon is very heavy, and will collect at the lowest point - even if it is coming from the walls.

Ventilation is the way to deal with it
though.
Agreed - far more practical to install in an existing house.

Can Radon get through plastic DPM?
Only to a small degree.
 

The Natural Philosopher

Usenet Archive
Joined
Jul 5, 2003
Messages
29,127
Reaction score
0
Dave said:
I guess most comes up from the ground, but what about walls made of that nice cornish granite? Ventilation is the way to deal with it though.
I think that the walls are not the usual major problem. IIRC its more a question of it seeoping up from the ground.
Maybe we need more info from the OP. Type/age of house, floor construction, recently fitted DG'ing etc. I'd have thought any moderately recent place with a solid floor would have a plastic DPM these days. Can Radon get through plastic DPM?
Not that well, no, but that raises the concentrations under it so any small leak...
 

The Natural Philosopher

Usenet Archive
Joined
Jul 5, 2003
Messages
29,127
Reaction score
0
Grunff said:
The reason suspended floors with a 'sump' arrangement work is because radon is very heavy, and will collect at the lowest point - even if it is coming from the walls.
Ah. I hadn't thought that through. It has to be heavy, being radioactive...
 

bof

Usenet Archive
Joined
Jul 19, 2003
Messages
296
Reaction score
0
The Natural said:
Ah. I hadn't thought that through. It has to be heavy, being radioactive...
Not necessarily, Tritium isn't.
 

The Natural Philosopher

Usenet Archive
Joined
Jul 5, 2003
Messages
29,127
Reaction score
0
bof said:
Not necessarily, Tritium isn't.
On investigation, you are right. Tritium is both light and radioactive, It also has a half life measured in days, so poses very little hazard.

Perhaps I should have said more exactly that 'any radioactive element with a sufficient half life to actually be present and represent a risk to health will be very heavy'

Tritium only occurs naturally AFAICT on account of cosmic ray bombardment. It decays as fast as it is produced.
 

Grunff

Usenet Archive
Joined
Jul 3, 2003
Messages
3,140
Reaction score
0
The said:
Radioactive nuclei are radioactive because they are effing big and disintegrate.

All radioactive elements are HEAVY.
<ahem>

Tritium?
 

Sam Nelson

Usenet Archive
Joined
Jul 29, 2003
Messages
101
Reaction score
0
On investigation, you are right. Tritium is both light and radioactive, It also has a half life measured in days, so poses very little hazard.
12.something years, according to

www.epa.gov/radiation/radionuclides/tritium.htm and

others: 4500+/-8 days.
Perhaps I should have said more exactly that 'any radioactive element with a sufficient half life to actually be present and represent a risk to health will be very heavy'

Tritium only occurs naturally AFAICT on account of cosmic ray bombardment. It decays as fast as it is produced.
This will be a different kind of tritium, then, from the stuff in the Traser key-tags in my pockets, will it? Ummm...
 

Grunff

Usenet Archive
Joined
Jul 3, 2003
Messages
3,140
Reaction score
0
The said:
Perhaps I should have said more exactly that 'any radioactive element with a sufficient half life to actually be present and represent a risk to health will be very heavy'
That covers you for the many radioactive isotopes of common elements then (C13, N15 etc).
 

bof

Usenet Archive
Joined
Jul 19, 2003
Messages
296
Reaction score
0
The Natural said:
Tritium is not IIRC radioactive...
Well Tritium has a half life of around 12 years, Uranium 235 (the stuff they make atomic bombs from) has a half life around 700million years.
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
144,907
Messages
1,592,101
Members
59,482
Latest member
lisac

Latest Threads

Top